Er zijn momenteel 15834 spelers online!
Mens tegen machine - succes!
Correspondentieschaak op elk moment!
Stem op de beste zet om te winnen!
Hoe goed ben jij?
Verfijn je tactisch inzicht!
Krijg advies en spelinzicht!
Leer van topschakers en profs!
Bekijk miljoenen meesterpartijen!
Je virtuele schaakcoach!
Perfectioneer je openingszetten!
Test je vaardigheden tegen de computer!
Vind de juiste privécoach!
Kun jij hem elke dag oplossen?
Breng alles samen!
Beginners, start hier!
Maak vrienden en speel teamwedstrijden!
Nieuws uit de schaakwereld!
Zoeken in alle leden van Chess.com
Vind lokale clubs & evenementen!
Wie van je vrienden is de beste?
Lees wat leden zeggen!
I always hear people say "analyze master games!" What are some different ways to do that effectively?
For me one of the most productive methods of playing through games is to play through a game in about 30-45 mins on average stopping occaisonally. The point for me is to get a balance between the flow of the game and in trying to figure out possible moves and then compare them to the text moves.
Generally, I play quickly through the opening, go slowly through the middle game, and play quickly through the endgame, unless the endgame is tight where I might go more slowly over it. In short, I do what I want with it, try to take something, even just one thing from each game and have fun with it. That's important. Also Heisman recommends that sort of time frame to gain maximum returns from a game and that feels about right to me.
k i was going to go thru evry moves after the opening and: 1) give who i think the position is better for and by a lot or a little 2) give the best 3 moves 15 ply deep. Then check this project with the computer. Would this method be helpful?
Write it down or there isn't going to be analysis, it is just casual thinking in the moment.
It sounds interesting but possibily a little time consuming and impractical if you are going to do that for every move after the opening. It might be better if you did it after every 5 moves after the opening or every 5 moves or so when not in the middle of a combination. Say you are looking at a game that lasts 40 moves. If you start at move 10 and then do the same at move 15, move 20 when not in the middle of an exchange, then my guess is that would work better.
yes that is what i meant writing it all down. And using only GM vs. GM games.
oh just now saw the every 5 moves suggestion i think that will work well do anybody have any good game suggestions?
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
door Doggy_Style enkele minuten geleden
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
door Griever3216 3 minuten geleden
The Troll's Analysis Thread
door December_TwentyNine 4 minuten geleden
Is it possible to make true (and real) friendship between two chess players?
door Till_98 5 minuten geleden
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
door rohanpilli 6 minuten geleden
Tolerable or Intolerable.
door knightkrawlirr 11 minuten geleden
House of Staunton review
door goodknightmike 11 minuten geleden
Acceptable or Unacceptable
door Till_98 12 minuten geleden
Is being self taught good or bad?
door Till_98 17 minuten geleden
Paul Morphy Screenplay
door Alex1968 17 minuten geleden
Waarom lid worden | Schaakonderwerpen |
Veel gestelde vragen |
Hulp en ondersteuning |
Juridische informatie |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Schaken - Nederlands
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!