Titled Tuesday is LIVE with IM Danny Rensch on Twitch and ChessTV! Open to ALL MEMBERS! Click here to watch!
Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Beaten despite having what looked like an advantage at the end.

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #1


    Hi! I've not been playing long (played a bit when I was a kid, and enjoying playing again now, despite the odd moment of head-banging stupidity). Had a game against a higher-ranked opponent, and I thought that towards the end I had what should have been a game-winning advantage. Would anyone like to tell me where I went wrong (either in the end game or earlier - I know there are a few foul-ups in there).

    I've added notes through the game, as best I can remember. I figure that at turn 40 I should have a decisive advantage, but fluffed it. And 49.b5 was a mistake I'm still kicking myself over.

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #3


    46 Nxh3+ seems better...?  But I am not certain of it.

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #4


    Thanks, Bonesy1116. I didn't really think about pawn structure from 20.g5, but now you mention it it seems obvious that that would make a mess of things.

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #5


    Thanks jonnin. I wasn't sure about the rook swap, especially with a pawn race going on, but I figured that the knight advantage would count for more with the rooks off the board. I was also a bit worried that I couldn't defend my pawns from a rook as easily as he could, as mine were in a terrible arrangement and distant from the King.

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #6


    It is difficult to defend against multiple pawns by just having a knight. You must play precisely to win. It's a better decision to keep the rooks on the board as they are better defenders and can counterattack very easily.

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #7


    I think 54... f6 looks like a mistake. 54... Nxb4 55. d6 a5 might work for a tricky draw. 

  • 2 jaar geleden · Citeer · #8


     The trick here to win for Black is to ---- (1) Create a passed pawn----- (2) Transpose  into a theoretically winning K+P vs. K+P ending with a Distant Passed Pawn - by Sacrificing the N for one of the 2 passed pawns                   

Terug naar boven

Je reactie plaatsen: