Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Why is the dragon considered dubious


  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #41

    madhacker

    Two titled players who are much stronger than any of the rest of us post on this thread, offering useful advice, and all some people do is argue which one of the two is stronger? It might be an idea to listen to them instead.

  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #42

    Iknownotwhy

    The dragon is not only dubious, it is  down right dangerous due to it's fire breathing capabilities, plus they are notoriously hard to train and keep loyal.I had one once but sold it after it ate my dog and the neighbour.

  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #43

    SmyslovFan

    Karpov's loss to Korchnoi was in a 1971 training match. He got his revenge in 1974 in the Candidates and I don't think Korchnoi played against Karpov again.

  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #44

    DaBigOne

    he did, he played 2 wcc with karpov

  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #45

    Mainline_Novelty

    DaBigOne wrote:

    he did, he played 2 wcc with karpov

    I think he means the Korchnoi didn't play the Dragon against Karpov again.

  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #46

    Yereslov

    I never play the Dragon. Everything is booked.

  • 18 maanden geleden · Citeer · #47

    chessBBQ

    It's not dubious,its just risky


Terug naar boven

Je reactie plaatsen: